Healthcare Service

Know which numbers are moving, and why.

Most practices have data. Very few have answers. A monthly collections figure tells you what happened; it doesn't tell you whether your clean claims ratio slipped, which payer is underpaying, or which provider's E/M distribution is quietly costing you revenue.

Torix Solutions analyzes your practice's operational and financial data against defined benchmarks, identifies where performance is deviating, and returns specific corrective actions — not a dashboard you'll stop opening after two weeks.

Laptop showing analytics dashboards used for practice performance review

What we analyze

Operational and financial performance against defined benchmarks — so you get answers, not another unused dashboard.

  • Revenue Cycle KPIs

    Clean claims ratio, days in AR (tracked against a 30–35 day claim payment target), net collection rate, denial rate by payer and root cause, AR aging distribution, and cost to collect — the metrics that actually predict financial health.

  • Coding & Documentation Patterns

    ICD-10 and CPT assignment reviewed for accuracy and distribution. We flag E/M level patterns that fall outside specialty norms — misused evaluation and management codes are among the most common and expensive coding failures.

  • Payer Performance & Contract Compliance

    Reimbursement rates compared across payers and against your contracted fee schedules. We surface which payers are underpaying, which contracts are due for renewal, and where your payer mix is working against you.

  • Accounts Receivable Analysis

    Where cash flow is obstructed, quantified by cause: unworked denials, stalled follow-up, unbilled secondaries, uncollected patient balances, and claims approaching timely filing limits.

  • Provider Productivity

    Individual provider performance on volume, coding accuracy, documentation completeness, and revenue contribution — compared against benchmarks from comparable practices. The point isn't ranking providers; it's identifying behaviors that affect practice-level results.

  • Front-Office & Workflow Efficiency

    Registration accuracy, eligibility verification completion, and authorization capture — the front-end steps that determine whether a claim was ever going to be paid.

What you receive

Findings and next steps you can use to plan, budget, and verify improvement.

  • Performance Report

    Current-state metrics with benchmark comparison and variance flagged.

  • Gap Analysis

    Where performance is deviating and what's causing it.

  • Prioritized Recommendations

    Ranked by revenue impact and implementation effort.

  • Financial Forecast Inputs

    Data you can actually plan and budget against.

  • Compliance Findings

    Coding, documentation, and payer requirement gaps.

  • Follow-Up Reporting

    Verification that implemented changes moved the metric.

Our process

From data collection through ongoing tracking — so performance is monitored, not sampled once.

  1. Data Collection

    Front-office records, billing and coding data, remittance data, payer contracts, and fee schedules.

  2. Benchmark Selection

    Targets set against your specialty, practice size, and payer mix — not generic industry averages.

  3. Analysis

    Statistical review of KPIs, denial patterns, coding distribution, and AR composition.

  4. Root Cause Identification

    Distinguishing symptoms from causes; a rising denial rate is a symptom.

  5. Recommendations

    Specific, sequenced, and assigned — tied to estimated revenue impact where possible.

  6. Ongoing Tracking

    Recurring reporting so performance is monitored, not sampled.

Specialties we support

Analysis scoped to how your specialty actually bills and collects.

  • Internal Medicine

    Performance review tailored to outpatient volume, E/M distribution, and multi-payer primary care cycles.

  • Urgent Care

    High-throughput claim patterns, same-day documentation, and AR targets that fit urgent care workflows.

  • Pain Management

    Procedure-heavy coding, authorization-sensitive services, and specialty-specific denial and productivity patterns.

Why Torix Solutions

Benchmarks, root cause, and recommendations tied to dollars — with a path to implement findings.

  • Operating Experience

    Analysts and consultants with direct revenue cycle operating experience, not general-purpose data staff.

  • Benchmarks, Not Just Numbers

    A metric without a comparison point isn't information. Every KPI is reported against a defined target.

  • Root Cause Over Reporting

    Identifying that denials rose is the easy part. We identify which payer, which code family, and which upstream step.

  • Recommendations Tied to Dollars

    Each finding carries an estimated revenue impact so you can sequence by return.

  • HIPAA Compliant Throughout

    All PHI and financial data handled under documented safeguards.

  • Connected to Execution

    Because Torix also runs revenue cycle management, billing audits, and credentialing, findings can be implemented rather than just delivered.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

How is performance analysis different from a billing audit?

An audit tests a sample of claims for accuracy and compliance — it answers "were these coded and billed correctly?" Performance analysis is broader and forward-looking: it measures the whole revenue cycle against benchmarks to answer "where is this practice losing money, and what should change?" Audits often feed into it.

What data do you need from us?

Front-office and registration records, billing and coding data, remittance and payment data, payer contracts, and fee schedules. We'll provide a specific list scoped to your systems.

How often should performance be reviewed?

Monthly for core KPIs, quarterly for deeper analysis. Annual review is too infrequent to catch a trend while it's still cheap to correct.

What benchmarks do you compare against?

Specialty-specific and practice-size-adjusted benchmarks rather than blanket industry averages. A 40-day AR figure means something different in a surgical practice than in urgent care.

Can you analyze performance if our billing is handled in-house or by another vendor?

Yes. Analysis is independent of who runs the billing. The findings are yours regardless.

Do you provide reporting on an ongoing basis or as a one-time engagement?

Both. Some practices need a one-time assessment; others prefer recurring KPI and follow-up reporting. We'll confirm scope and cadence during the assessment conversation.

How quickly do we see results?

Front-end fixes — eligibility verification, registration accuracy, authorization capture — typically show up within a billing cycle. Coding and contract changes take longer to flow through.

Get started with a performance assessment.

If you can't currently state your clean claims ratio, your denial rate by root cause, and your days in AR, you're managing the practice's finances on a lagging indicator. Send us your specialty, practice size, and payer mix and we'll scope an analysis.

Request an Audit